THE CITY OF TAMPA ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
R. M. PRINCE, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1912-01-01
Taylor, Cockrell and Hocker, JJ., concur., Shackleford, J., takes no part.
63 Fla. 387 Florida Supreme Court (1912) Positive Treatment
Cited by 23 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court reversed an injunction that prevented the City of Tampa from purchasing property and levying taxes to establish and maintain a free public library. The court held that the legislature had validly authorized the city to establish a public library as a municipal purpose and to levy taxes for its maintenance.


Holding

The City of Tampa has express statutory authority to establish and maintain a free public library as a municipal purpose, and the legislature validly authorized the city to raise funds by taxation for this purpose. The authority to maintain a library necessarily includes authority to establish one, and the city may exercise this authority within the prescribed limits.


Key Quotes

“It is within the province of the legislature to declare what is a municipal purpose; and a duly enacted statute designating a municipal purpose is subject only to the provisions and principles of organic law.”

Establishes the foundational principle that the legislature has authority to define municipal purposes within constitutional limits.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The City of Tampa sought to purchase a lot within the city and incur expenses for plans and specifications for a library building, and to levy a tax f…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Whitfield, C. J.

Whitfield, C. J.

— This appeal is from a decree enjoining the City of Tampa and its officers from contracting to puchase a lot in the city and from incurring indebtedness for plans and specifications for a library building to be erected on the lot, and from levying a tax for the maintenance of a free public library.

The constitution provides: “The Legislature shall establish a uniform system of - municipal government, which shall be applicable, except in cases where local or special laws are provided by the legislature that may be inconsistent therewith.” Sec. 24, Art. III. “The legislature shall have power to establish and to abolish municipalities, to provide for their government, to prescribe their jurisdiction and powers, and to alter or amend the same at any time.” Sec. 8, Art. VIII. “The legislature shall authorize the several-- incorporated cities or towns in the State to assess and impose taxes for-municipal purposes, and for no other purposes.” Sec. 5, Art. IN.

The statute incorporates the City of Tampa and provides that the city “may purchase, lease, receive and hold px'operty, real and personal - for any public purpose that the mayor and city council may deem necessary and proper;” and authorizes the city “to raise by taxation such amount as may be necessary to maintain a public library in said city not to exceed one-fourth mill on the dollar upon the taxable propex’ty in the City of Tampa.” Section 1 and 14, Chapter 6402, Acts of 1911.

It is within the province of the legislature to declare what is a municipal pux*pose; and a duly enacted statute designating a municipal purpose is subject only to the provisions and principles of organic law.

As the city is expressly authorized to raise by taxation funds “necessary to íxxaintain a public library in said city,” the maintenance of such a librax*y is a municipal purpose not excluded by organic law; and any proper ac tion taken by the city to effectuate the designated municipal purpose within the prescribed limits is authorized. The authority given to maintain a public library necessarily includes authority to establish one. There is nothing in the pleadings to show that the contract for the purchase of the lot Avill violate sections 38 and 39 of Chapter 5363, Acts of 1903, relating to the municipal authority of the city.

Chapter 6199, Acts of 1911, a general law authorizitng cities and towns to establish and maintain free public libraries and reading rooms, does not expressly repeal the above quoted provisions of Chapter 6402, Acts of 1911, a special law relating to the municipal government of the City of Tampa; and in view of the stated constitutional provisions and of the rule of construction that a general law does not repeal by implication a special law covering a portion of the same subject when an intent to repeal does not appear, Chapter 6199 does not repeal Chapter 6402. This is particularly so since the two acts were passed at the same session of the legislature. 36 Cyc. 1086. There is no repugnancy or inconsistency between the provisions of the two Chapters, and they may both be utilized to effectuate the legislative intent.

It being within the power of the legislature to confer upon the City of Tampa authority to levy a tax for the maintenance of a public library in said city as has been done by Chapter 6402, Acts of 1911, the policy of the statute is not to be considered by the courts. The City may exercise the authority given in the manner and to the extent contemplated by law.

The decree is reversed.

Taylor, Cockrell and Hocker, JJ., concur. Shackleford, J., takes no part.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (11 total)

  • …y between the two, or the latter was clearly intended to prescribe the only rule which should govern the case provided for, or it revises the subject matter of the former, or expressly repeals it.” See also the discussion in City of Tampa v. Prince, 63 Fla. 387, 58 South. Rep. 542. As we said in Smith v. Milton, 61 Fla. 745, text 764, 54 South. Rep. 719, “The invariable rule of construction in respect to the repealing of statutes by implication, is, that the earliest act remains in force, unless the two ar…
  • State v. City of Stuart, 97 Fla. 69 (Fla. 1929)
    …e other provisions of the constitution, expressed or implied. MacGuyer v. Tampa, 89 Fla. 138, 103 So. R. 418; Brown v. City of Lakeland, 61 Fla. 508, 54 So. R. 716; City of Jacksonville v. Bowden, 67 Fla. 181, 64 So. R. 769; City of Tampa v. Prince, 63 Fla. 387, 58 So. R. 542; State ex rel v. Johns, 92 Fla. 187, 109 So. R. 228; State v. City of Sarasota, 92 Fla. 563, 109 So. R. 473. In the MacGuyer case, it was held, and correctly so, that un [*107] der this Section the Legislature can annex territory to a…
  • Abell v. Town of Boynton, 95 Fla. 984 (Fla. 1928)
    …we think both must be permitted to stand. There was therefore no error in the Town of Boynton exercising its option to proceed with [*988] the improvements and issuing bonds to pay for them under Chapter 9298, Acts of 1923. City of Tampa v. Prince, 63 Fla. 387, 58 So. 542; Sanders v. Howell, 73 Fla. 563, 74 So. 802; St. Petersburg v. Pinellas County Power Co., 87 Fla. 315, 100 So. Rep. 509. If the Town of Boynton appropriated the lands of appellant for a public street without having legally acquired titl…

Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw