JOHNNY LEE CROSS, PETITIONER,
v.
NICK NAVARRO, SHERIFF OF BROWARD COUNTY AND RICHARD D. EADE, JUDGE, 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, RESPONDENTS
JOHNNY LEE CROSS, PETITIONER,
NICK NAVARRO, SHERIFF OF BROWARD COUNTY AND RICHARD D. EADE, JUDGE, 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, RESPONDENTS
585 So. 2d 1040
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted. See Berry v. State, 547 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Royal v. State, 389 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). The petitioner shall be released from custody forthwith as the sentence imposed has been fully served.
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and WARNER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Eastern Cement v. Halliburton Co., 600 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…merge as the prevailing party in this cause, we must at least temporarily, reverse the taxing of costs, interest and attorney’s fees against the buyer and postpone that reckoning until the final outcome. See Magner v. Merrill Lynch Realty/MCK, Inc., 585 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). We find no other reversible error on appeal. COMMENTARY We recognize that the analysis in the second issue and the citations employed are not apparent in the briefs and were not argued to the trial judge. Nonetheless, the iss…
-
Myers v. Cardy Mae Myers, 652 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…al, vague or conclusory. Beckler v. Hoffman, 550 So. 2d 68, 70 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Where the elements of a [*1216] cause of action are not pled, they may not be inferred from the context of the allegations. Maguer v. Merrill Lynch Realty/MCK, Inc., 585 So. 2d 1040, 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), rev. denied, 598 So. 2d 77 (Fla.1992). The requirement that fraud be pled with particularity is especially applicable to cases where the plaintiff obtains a default judgment. This is because parties seeking affirmative re…
-
D'Alusio v. Gould & Lamb, LLC, 36 So. 3d 842 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…appellate costs or attorney’s fees is to file a motion for review in the appellate court in the proceeding that was the subject of the award, within 30 days of rendition of the order in the lower tribunal”); Magner v. Merrill Lynch Realty/MCK, Inc., 585 So. 2d 1040, 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (holding that the failure to file a motion for review of appellate attorneys’ fees under rule 9.400(c) within thirty days of rendition waived the issue for appeal). We recognize that there exists a limited exception for rev…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Royal v. State, 389 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)
- Berry v. State, 547 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)