WALLACE MIRRAL TAYLOR, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1991-10-02
No. 90-01219
DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.
586 So. 2d 503 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence on the basis of Williams v. State, 559 So. 2d 680 (Fla.2d DCA 1990) (en banc), and certify to the Florida Supreme Court the same question that we certified in Williams as being one of great public importance. We further certify that our decision in Williams is in direct conflict with Maxwell v. State, 576 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Taylor v. State, 595 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 1992)
    …PER CURIAM. We review Taylor v. State, 586 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), in which the district court certified the same question of great public importance as we answered in Williams v. State, 594 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 1992).1 In Williams, we held that in the case of multiple violations of probation, se…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw