SABAL CHASE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court vacated summary judgment and attorney's fees against homeowners who erected a fence, remanding for further proceedings regarding the homeowners' association's right to approve fences and its succession to the developer's rights.
The appellate court vacated the judgments, finding that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment and attorney's fees to the homeowners' association and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Homeowners erected a six-foot chain link fence on their property. The homeowners' association sought to have the fence removed, alleging it violated t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
The trial court correctly held that:
The use of Parcel 25A as an elementary school (Scheme “A” proposed site plan) as authorized by Dade County pursuant to Resolution No. R-1016-90 does not violate the restrictive covenants applicable to Parcel 25A and is a permissible use of the property by Dade County.
Affirmed.