BILLY HAMILTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Oral Pronouncement Of Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
GRIFFIN, Judge.
The appellant entered guilty pleas to burglary of a structure and to resisting an officer without violence. At the sentencing hearing, the trial judge pronounced a sentence of three years imprisonment on the burglary offense and a concurrent sentence of one year in the county jail on the other offense. There is an identical notation on the guidelines scoresheet and in the court minutes. However, the box at the bottom of the “sentence” form designed to indicate concurrent sentences is not marked. The state unaccountably suggests this case should be remanded for “clarification” based on a record “conflict”. We disagree; the trial court’s intent is plain. We affirm the judgment but vacate the sentence and remand for entry of a corrected sentence that conforms to the oral pronouncement.
SENTENCE VACATED and REMANDED for correction.
W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Allen v. State, 929 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…ent of conviction. The sentences imposed for counts II and III are therefore vacated, and the cause is remanded for entry of a corrected sentence to conform with the trial court’s intent as indicated in the sentencing hearing. See Hamilton v. State, 586 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Appellant need not be present for entry of the corrected sentence. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED. ERVIN, BARFIELD and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.…