WILLIAM HENRY GILLIAM, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1991-10-31
No. 91-84
W. SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur., DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially with opinion.
587 So. 2d 1186 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Thomas v. State, 583 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

W. SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur. DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Concurrence
DAUKSCH, Judge,

DAUKSCH, Judge,

concurring specially.

I concur because I am bound by the Thomas v. State, 583 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) decision. However, I am moved to say that a reading of the transcript clearly shows this appellant was arrested and jailed for riding his bell-less bicycle merely in order to permit a search incident to arrest. Had appellant been given a summons (“ticket”) no search would have been lawful. Thus it appears appellant’s arrest was pretextual. That is, the arrest was made for a most trivial municipal ordinance violation in order to see if anything incriminating could be found. Pretextual searches cannot be allowed and had this been raised and established below and on appeal our decision might be different. State v. McCrery, 429 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. den., 438 So. 2d 834 (Fla.1983); Thomas v. State, 424 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Alvarez v. State, 403 So. 2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Buckhalter v. State, 599 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 1992)
    …PER CURIAM. We approve Buckhalter v. State, 587 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), on the authority of Burdick v. State, 594 So. 2d 267 (Fla.1992).1 It is so ordered. SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. . We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, sectio…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw