MICHAEL FREEMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
RICHARD DUGGER, APPELLEE
MICHAEL FREEMAN, APPELLANT,
RICHARD DUGGER, APPELLEE
588 So. 2d 12
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Michael Freeman appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petition relates to the forfeiture of gain time, based on alleged institutional misconduct by Freeman. We find no error in the trial court’s determination that Freeman failed to exhaust all available administrative remedies, a prerequisite to the issuance of an extraordinary writ. Accordingly, we affirm.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Griffith v. Dep't of Bus. Reg., 613 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…pari-mutuel facility in violation of the rule. “An agency’s interpretation of its rules and the statutes which it is charged to administer is to be given great deference.” Maclen Rehabilitation Center v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 588 So. 2d 12, 13 [*932] (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Public Employees Relations Comm ’n v. Dade County Police Benevolent Ass ’n, 467 So. 2d 987 (Fla.1985). The Director’s conclusion is supported by the hearing officer’s finding that Dr. Griffith had admitted providing t…
-
Reed v. Moore, 768 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…it of mandamus/alternative writ of habeas corpus. The petition related to Reed’s eligibility for gain time. Based on the record before us, Reed has failed to show that he exhausted all of his available administrative remedies. See Freeman v. Dugger, 588 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) (affirming denial of petition where defendant failed to exhaust all available administrative remedies). Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to Reed’s right to file a new petition upon the ex [*480] haustion of all administrat…