EVELYN CARMEN PRESSLER, PETITIONER,
v.
DAVID WAYNE PRESSLER, RESPONDENT

Fla. 4th DCA | 1991-11-06
No. 91-2626
ANSTEAD, WARNER and POLEN, JJ„ concur.
588 So. 2d 74 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This petition for writ of prohibition is granted as the trial court has lost jurisdiction to consider the motion for rehearing which was untimely filed by respondent. See Roosa v. Roosa, 519 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Estate of Godley, 508 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). The trial court is hereby prohibited from proceeding further in this cause and the previously entered order granting rehearing is quashed.

ANSTEAD, WARNER and POLEN, JJ„ concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rosenbloom v. Guardianship OF Benjamin Schleider, 876 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
    …PER CURIAM. This petition for writ of prohibition is granted as the trial court lost jurisdiction to consider the untimely motion for rehearing filed by respondent. Pressler v. Pressler, 588 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) and cases cited; Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. of Shelby, Ohio v. Pearson, 236 So. 2d 1, 4 (Fla.1970) (order granting untimely motion for rehearing is “null, void, and completely without effect”). FARMER, C.J., KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., co…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw