WENDELL R. ALEXANDER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1991-11-06
No. 90-00849
DANAHY, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
588 So. 2d 75 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgments and sentences but remand the case for calculation and determination of the amount of credit for jail time served to which the appellant is entitled on each conviction.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Raines v. State, 14 So. 3d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
    …prone to use the old terminology and often the old procedures. See, e.g., Bowers v. State, 845 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Thornton v. State, 830 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Bogush v. State, 597 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Hubbard v. State, 588 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). So long as the sentence complied with the applicable "habitual offender” sentencing requirements, this court never regarded references to alternative terms such as "subsequent felony offender” or "career criminal” to be errors th…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw