RANDY GARCIGA, APPELLANT,

v.

MARY ROSE GARCIGA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Fulcher v. State, 766 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
  …ed in the preparation of his defense. See Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.140(o). We therefore find that the trial court erred in granting the motion to arrest the judgment. Id. at 264-65. See also Mesa v. State, 632 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Hope v. State, 588 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Because the information in this case referenced the appropriate sections of our criminal code, the information was sufficient. Appellant also argues that the trial court erred in not fully instructing the jury on all of the ele…
• Billiot v. State, 711 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
  …378 So. 2d 348 (Fla.l979)(holding plea of guilty to the crime of battery of a law enforcement officer, after the state had properly established a factual basis, constituted a tacit amendment to the information to charge the offense); Hope v. State, 588 So. 2d 255, 258 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)(holding that “pleading to an offense acknowledging the existence of unpled essential elements, implicitly amends the information to include them.”). In Burns v. State, appellant was charged with larceny and entered a guilty…
• KIO v. State, 624 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
  …use of a firearm as to one of the several battery charges instead of as to the attempted first-degree murder charge. Pleading to an offense requiring the existence of unpled elements implicitly amends the information to include them. Hope v. State, 588 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).…

Authorities Cited

• Wolfson v. Wolfson, 455 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)