ANTHONY LEE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgments and sentences but remand with directions that the sentences be amended to provide for the correct amount of credit for jail time served by appellant. Franklin v. State, 515 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).1
ERVIN, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur. . It appears from the record that appellant’s sentence, imposed pursuant to section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1987), may be in violation of the holding in Barnes v. State, 576 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), issued subsequent to sentencing in the case at bar. We do not address this issue, which was not raised either below or before this court. We remand without prejudice to raising this issue by post-trial motion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The City OF Jacksonville v. Wynn, 650 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…intent of the legislature, as clearly set out in the statute, is to provide the administrative forum as the “sole method for determining whether a local government plan is in compliance” with the Act. State Dep’t of Community Affairs v. Lee County, 588 So. 2d 272, 275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (Kahn, J., concurring). The “reason for this legislative directive is to encourage uniform standards to be applied in the development and approval of comprehensive plans.” Id. The legislature had reason to deprive circuit c…
-
Fla. Comm'n on Hurricane Loss Projection Methodology v. State, 716 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)…er ... of an administrative law judge ... is immediately reviewable if review of the final agency decision would not-provide an adequate remedy.” ■§ 120.68(1), Fla. Stat. (1997). See State, Dep’t. of Community Affairs v. Division of Admin. Hearings, 588 So. 2d 272, 274 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). In its petition here, however, FCHLPM expressly “recognizes that the Recommended Order of which it seeks review is favorable to the Commission.” But FCHLPM’s petition goes on: Any doubt as to the manner in which the Commi…
-
Holmes Reg'l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Agency FOR Health Care Admin. & Wuesthoff Mem'l Hosp., Inc., 731 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)…nterlocutory review is not available as a matter of course in an administrative proceeding merely because the parties wish to resolve an important issue before the final hearing. See, e.g., Department of Community Affairs v. Div. of Admin. Hearings, 588 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Butterworth v. Public Employees Relations Comm’n, 382 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Rather, the opportunity to review a nonfinal order exists only in those cases in which the court must address an issue immediately to protect…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Barnes v. State, 576 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
- Franklin v. State, 515 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)