IN RE ADVISORY OPINION TO THE GOVERNOR

Fla. | 1912-06-01
64 Fla. 168 Florida Supreme Court (1912) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court advises Governor Gilchrist that he lacks constitutional authority to suspend a County Commissioner for misconduct committed during a prior term of office. The opinion holds that the Governor's suspension power under Article IV, Section 15 of the Florida Constitution is limited to misconduct occurring during the officer's current term.


Holding

The Governor lacks authority to suspend a County Commissioner for misconduct committed prior to the officer's current term. The Constitution's suspension power is necessarily confined to the current term of office and contemplates that causes for suspension arise from conduct during the officer's present commission.


Key Quotes

“The power thus given the Governor to suspend the incumbent of an office and to fill the office by appointment, is necessarily confined to the current term of the office.”

Establishes the core holding that suspension authority is limited temporally to the current term

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The Governor requested an advisory opinion regarding a County Commissioner who allegedly received a bribe approximately eight years prior while servin…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

To His Excellency, Albert W.

Gilchrist, Governor of Florida.

Dear Sir:— The following communication from you has been received : “State of Florida, Executive Department, Tallahassee, December 13, 1912.

To the Honorable The Chief Justice and the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of Florida.

Gentlemen:— It has been represented to me that one of the present members of the Board of County Commissioners of one of the counties of this State, about eight years ago, while at that time serving as a member of the Board of County Commissioners under a commission prior to the commission under which he is now serving, corruptly received a bribe of a considerable sum of money to influence his action and vote as a member of such Board of County Commissioners.

The charge comes from a source entitled to respectful consideration, and upon such charge I am requested as Governor, to remove the said member of the Board of County Commissioners from office.

In pursuance of the provisions of Section 13 of Article IY of the Constitution of the State of Florida, I have the honor to request the opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Court as to whether, as Governor, I have authority under Section 15 of Article IY of the State Constitution, or under any other Section of the State Constitution, to suspend a member of the Board of County Commissioners for any act of malfeasance or misfeasance committed by him in his said office under a commission prior to the commission under which he is now serving.

Very respectfully, Albert W.

Gilchrist, Governor.” Section 15 of Article IV provides that: “All officers that shall have been appointed or elected, and that are not liable to impeachment, may be suspended from office by the Governor for malfeasance, or misfeasance, or neglect of duty in office, for the commission of any felony, or for drunkenness or incompetency, and the cause of suspension shall be communicated to the officer suspended and to the Senate at its next session.

And the Governor, by and with the consent of the Senate, may remove any officer, not liable to impeachment, for any cause above named.

Every suspension shall continue until the adjournment of the next session of the Senate, unless the officer suspended shall, upon the recommendation of the Governor, be removed; but the Governor may reinstate the officer so suspended upon satisfactory evidence that the charge or charges against him are untrue.

If the Senate shall refuse to remove, or fail to take action before its adjournmrent, the officer suspended shall resume the duties of the office.

The Governor shall have power to fill by appointment any office, the incumbent of which has been suspended.

No officer suspended who shall under this section resume the duties of his office, shall suffer any loss of salary or other compensation in consequence of such suspension.

The suspension or removal herein authorized shall not relieve the officer from indictment for any misdemeanor in office.”

The power thus given the Governor to suspend the incumbent of an office and to fill the office by appointment, is necessarily confined to the current term of the office.

See Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 31 Fla. 1, 12 South.

Rep. 114.

The causes for suspension are “malfeasance, or misfeasance, or neglect of duty in office, for the commission of any felony, or for drunkenness or incompetency,” and the Constitution contemplates that the causes for suspension from office shall arise from the conduct of the officer during the term for which the officer is then in commission.

You are therefore respectfully advised that the Constitution does not authorize the Governor to suspend an incumbent of the office of County Commissioner for an act of malfeasance or misfeasance in office committed by him prior to the date of the beginning of his present term of office as such County Commissioner. Yery respectfully, J. B.

Whitfield, R. F. Taylor, R. S.

Cockrell, T. M.

Shackleford, W. A. Hocker, Justices of the Supreme Court.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State of Fla. ex rel. Jack M. Turner v. Earle, 295 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 1974)
    …nce of disqualification to hold office in the future because of such misconduct. (See Article VI, Section 4, Florida Constitution 1968, F.S.A.) In Re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 31 Fla. 1, 12 So. 114 (1893); In Re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 64 Fla. 168, 60 So. 337 (1912); State ex rel. Hardee v. Allen, 126 Fla. 878, 172 So. 222 (1937); Rosenfelder v. Huttoe, 156 Fla. 682, 24 So. 2d 108 (1945); State ex rel. Hawthorne v. Wisehart, 158 Fla. 267, 28 So. 2d 589 (1946); In re Proposed Disciplinary Acti…
    1 / 2
  • State v. Allen, 126 Fla. 878 (Fla. 1937)
    …a time prior to the date of the beginning of his current term (during which he was suspended) and being so the Governor was without power to suspend. To support this contention relator relies on In Re: Advisory Opinion to the Governor, reported in 64 Fla. 168, 60 So. 337, wherein we held that the power given the Governor to suspend an officer for malfeasance or misfeasance'' and to fill the vacancy thus caused by appointment is nec [*884] essarily confined to.the current term or that for which he is then…
    1 / 2
  • …nce of disqualification to hold office in the future because of such misconduct. (See Article VI, Section 4, Florida Constitution 1968, F.S.A.) In Re Advisory Opinion to the Governor, 31 Fla. 1, 12 So. 114 (1893); In Re Advisory Opinion to Governor, 64 Fla. 168, 60 So. 387 (1912); State ex rel. Hardee v. Allen, 126 Fla. 878, 172 So. 222 (1937); Rosenfelder v. Huttoe, 156 Fla. 682, 24 So. 2d 108 (1945); State ex rel. Hawthorne v. Wisehart, 158 Fla. 267, 28 So. 2d 589 (1946); In re Proposed Disciplinary Acti…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw