ANTHONY ROBERT MILLER, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ANTHONY ROBERT MILLER, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
588 So. 2d 607
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1991)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges his conviction and sentence for two counts of delivery of cannabis. We find no merit in the points he raises in the appeal. We affirm his conviction and sentence.
We do, however, find that the judgment erroneously lists appellant’s convictions as second degree felonies. As provided in section 893.13(l)(a)(2), Florida Statutes (1989), appellant is guilty of felonies in the third degree. We remand for correction of the judgment to so reflect, but otherwise affirm.
SCHOONOVER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Crane v. Barnett Bank OF Palm Beach Cnty., 698 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)…tion” of the instruments, which remain in full force and effect; however, the case cited is unpersuasive as it involves the ratification of unauthorized signatures and the retention of benefits received in the transaction. See Bloom v. G.P.F., S.A., 588 So. 2d 607, 610 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). The bank further urges this court to affirm the trial court’s judgment as to foreclosure as the borrower’s prayer for equitable relief is a prayer for general relief and the trial judge has the “fullest liberty” in molding…