TIMOTHY SPRY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1991-12-17
No. 91-293
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GERSTEN, JJ.
590 So. 2d 42 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the trial judge’s evident intent, the written. sentencing order shall be corrected to provide that the thirty year sentences as to Counts I and II are concurrent, rather than consecutive. In addition, the adjudication’s designation of two counts of attempted second degree murder with a firearm as life felonies shall provide instead that these offenses are first degree felonies. See Davis v. State, 486 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

There is no other harmful error. See Hayward v. State, 590 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); § 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1989).

Affirmed as modified.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw