MARIA KANE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ALFRED B. KANE, APPELLANT,
v.
MARILYN LORD, MICHELLE LORD, ELLEN LORD, AND DEBRA LORD HIRSH, APPELLEES
MARIA KANE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ALFRED B. KANE, APPELLANT,
MARILYN LORD, MICHELLE LORD, ELLEN LORD, AND DEBRA LORD HIRSH, APPELLEES
590 So. 2d 442
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1991)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Spohr v. Berryman, 564 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Scutieri v. Estate of Revitz, 510 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), review denied, 519 So. 2d 986 (Fla.1988); Harbour House Properties, Inc. v. Estate of Stone, 443 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Other
PER CURIAM.
We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing and reverse the order under review based on the authority of Spohr v. Berryman, 589 So. 2d 225 (Fla.1991).
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lewis v. State, 597 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…ns a conclusive defense to a criminal prosecution. Nevertheless, several factors lead me to share the uncertainty and misgivings which have been expressed about this conclusion. See State v. Pham, 595 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Simmons v. State, 590 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); see also State v. Petro, 592 So. 2d 254, 255 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). In the first place, it is clear that Hunter can be rationalized only on one of the alternative grounds that section 777.201, Florida Statutes (1987) did not…1 / 2
-
State v. Sargent, 617 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)…ishes the objective entrapment defense. See Gonzalez v. State, 571 So. 2d 1346 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1990), rev. denied, 584 So. 2d 998 (Fla.1991). See also State v. Think Thien Pham, 595 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (question certified); Simmons v. State, 590 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (question certified); State v. Munoz, 586 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA1991), juris, accepted, 598 So. 2d 77 (Fla.1992). In contrast, this district, as well as the second, third, and fourth districts have either specifically or implie…
-
Foster v. State, 596 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)…action rule, a court created concept that in concept and result somewhat resembled, and was generally confused with, constitutional double jeopardy rights, see Baker v. State, 425 So. 2d 36, 50 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). . Judge Wolf in Simmons v. State, 590 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) sees the problem involved when the legislature attempts by statute to abolish or change a judicial decision based on, or which overlaps or parallels, due process or other fundamental constitutionally mandated principles. . See t…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Spohr v. Berryman, 589 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1991)
- Harbour House Props., Inc. v. Est. OF Pearl G. Stone, 443 So. 2d 136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
- Scutieri v. Est. OF Phil Revitz, 510 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- Spohr v. Berryman, 564 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)