SAMUEL J. CHESTNUT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SAMUEL J. CHESTNUT, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
590 So. 2d 1119
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
LETTS, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s, Samuel J. Chestnut’s, motion for credit for time served in jail.
Appellant was convicted in 1976 of kidnapping and sexual battery and sentenced to consecutive sentences of twenty-five and fifty years, respectively. It appears that appellant was arrested on January 14,1976 and held without bond until September 3, 1976. The sentence, however, reflects no credit for time served. Thus, we remand with instructions that the trial court determine whether the appellant is entitled to credit for time served.
REMANDED.
STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alvarez v. State, 592 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…t of shooting into an occupied vehicle. “General sentences for multiple convictions are not proper.” Lewis v. State, 567 So. 2d 50, 51 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Nodel v. State, 579 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (on motion for rehearing); Morgan v. State, 590 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); see Dorfman v. State, 351 So. 2d 954 (Fla.1977). “A sentence must be imposed for each offense.” Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(12). We therefore vacate the sentence and remand the case for imposition of a separate sentence for each coun…