STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
ANNETTE JENKINS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court cannot depart downward from a mandatory minimum sentence, even with valid reasons for departure.
The defendant was charged with purchasing cocaine near a school, a violation carrying a mandatory minimum sentence. The trial court withheld adjudicat…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Downward Departure From Sentencing Guidelines cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellee was charged by information with purchasing cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school in violation of sections 893.-13(l)(e) and 893.03(2)(a)4, Florida Statutes (1989). She pled and moved the court to depart downward from the presumptive guidelines sentence, to avoid the three year minimum mandatory sentence, and to sentence her pursuant to section 397.12, Florida Statutes. The trial court withheld adjudication and placed her on probation for eighteen months. It entered a well-considered, four page order of departure in which it detailed reasons for sentencing her pursuant to section 397.12 and ordering her referred to a drug treatment program licensed through HRS. The state appealed the order as an illegal sentence.
We reverse. In State v. Baxter, 581 So. 2d 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), this court determined that a trial court cannot downward depart from a mandatory sentence even with valid reasons for departure. The court further noted that section 397.12, Florida Statutes (1989), relates only to defendants who have been convicted of possessing illegal drugs. See also State v. Lane, 582 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); State v. Baumgardner, 587 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); State v. Liataud, 587 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
However, the court certified the following question to the supreme court in State v. Scates, 585 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991):
MAY A TRIAL COURT PROPERLY DEPART FROM THE MINIMUM MANDATORY PROVISIONS OF SECTION 893.13(l)(e), FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE DRUG REHABILITATION PROVISION OF SECTION 397.12, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989)?
We also certify the same question here.
GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Baxter, 581 So. 2d 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
- State v. Carrick A. Scates, 585 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
- State v. Lane, 582 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
- State v. Liataud, 587 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
- Preston v. State, 587 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)