DARRYL DONNELL BOWERS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DARRYL DONNELL BOWERS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
591 So. 2d 311
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1991)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 24 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant raises two points on appeal. We find merit only in the point contesting the imposition of restitution in the court’s order modifying probation. The appellant contends that the court erred in ordering restitution without benefit of a hearing. We agree and strike condition 24 from the order modifying probation and direct the trial court to correct the appropriate probation order. Reversed and remanded with directions consistent herewith. Affirmed in all other respects.
LEHAN, A.C.J., and HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Timmons v. Combs, 608 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1992)…GRIMES, Justice. We review Timmons v. Combs, 579 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), because of its conflict with Gross v. Albertson’s, Inc., 591 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), and Memorial Sales, Inc. v. Pike, 579 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). We have jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Combs filed suit for damages against Timmons. On a jury verdict of no liabi…1 / 2
-
Allstate Indem. Co. v. Solen Hingson and Annette Hingson, 808 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 2002)…ts attributable to each plaintiff. See, e.g., Bodek v. Gulliver Academy, Inc., 702 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); V.I.P. Real Estate Corp. v. Florida Executive Realty Mgmt. Corp., 650 So. 2d 199, 201 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Gross v. Albertson’s, Inc., 591 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). On the authority of these cases we agree with K-Mart’s argument that its offer of judgment, served prior to the amendment to the rule, was not rendered ineffective to trigger the sanctions of the statute merely because it was a…1 / 2
-
V.I.P. Real Est. Corp. v. Fla. Executive Realty Mgmt. Corp., 650 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…nt offer of judgment to the plaintiff. Id. As was noted in Thompson, other cases have also recognized, without comment, the validity of joint offers. Id. See, e.g., Schmidt v. Fortner, 629 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Gross v. Albertson’s, Inc., 591 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). It would therefore appear that the appellee’s offer of judgment was not rendered invalid by the fact that it was a joint offer. We recognize that the two appellants had conflicting claims to the interpleaded funds. In some case…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence