JESSE O. PUCKETT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An order refusing to disqualify a judge is not an appealable order, and a petition for writ of prohibition based on such grounds will be denied if the grounds are legally insufficient.
Puckett sought to disqualify the judge presiding over his post-conviction relief motion, alleging the judge erred in accepting his plea and would be a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Material Witness cases and more on FLexlaw
W. SHARP, Judge.
Puckett appeals from an order entered by the trial judge refusing to disqualify himself from presiding over Puckett’s post-conviction relief motion. This is not an appealable order. Kowalski v. Boyles, 557 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We elect to treat this cause as a petition for writ of prohibition,1 and deny it on the merits.
Litigants have a right to seek the disqualification of a presiding judge when they have objective grounds to believe they will not receive a fair consideration at a trial or other judicial proceeding.2 In this case, the facts set forth in the motion and attached affidavits assert (in sum) that the judge erroneously accepted Puckett’s plea of no contest to a manslaughter charge, and that therefore he should be disqualified from presiding over Puckett’s efforts to set aside the plea because he is and will be a material party or witness. These grounds are legally insufficient to warrant disqualification.3
Petition for Writ of Prohibition DENIED.
DAUKSCH and HARRIS, JJ„ concur. . Fla.R.App.P. 9.040(c); Kowalski v. Boyles, 557 So. 2d 885, 886 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).
. § 38.10, Fla.Stat. (1989); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.432(d).
. See, e.g., Hope v. State, 449 So. 2d 1315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (claim that the trial judge who had previously adjudicated defendant guilty of civil contempt would be prejudiced and would be a necessary witness in the defendant’s criminal contempt proceeding arising from the same acts insufficient to warrant disqualification); Wilisch v. Wilisch, 335 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) (a trial judge does not become a material witness in a cause merely because he had knowledge of what occurred before him in a prior proceeding); Petition of Geisser, 554 F. 2d 698 (5th Cir.1977) (trial judge was not required to disqualify himself in ruling on defendant’s habeas corpus petition on the basis that he was a material witness to the disputed facts of the defendant’s plea bargain).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rainey v. Rainey, 702 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…PER CURIAM. Stanley Rainey, pro se, appeals from the order of the circuit judge refusing to disqualify him from presiding over Rainey’s divorce proceeding. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of prohibition, Puckett v. State, 591 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and deny the petition. See Hammond v. Eastmoore, 513 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) (motion legally insufficient where no affidavit was included and party did not swear that the facts alleged were true; acknowledgment before not…
-
D.H. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 12 So. 3d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…hat a reasonably prudent person would fear that he would not receive a fair and impartial hearing before the judge”). A subjective fear of bias is insufficient to justify granting the motion; rather, the fear must be objective. See Puckett v. State, 591 So. 2d 326, 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Fischer, 497 So. 2d at 242. It was not until May 27, 2008, the date when the adjudicatory hearing was scheduled for just minutes later that morning, that the trial court filed its order denying the motion for disqualificat…
Authorities Cited
- Petition of Josette Geisser v. United States, 554 F.2d 698 (5th Cir. 1977)
- Kowalski v. Boyles, 557 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)
- Wilisch v. Wilisch, 335 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
- Hope v. State, 449 So. 2d 1315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)