G. W. HALL AND J. P. DUBOIS, CO-PARTNERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
G. W. HALL AND J. P. DUBOIS, CO-PARTNERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
65 Fla. 111
Florida Supreme Court (1913)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
Upon the authority of Fornel v. Florida East Coast Railway Company this day decided, the judgment herein is reversed.
Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Dade County.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Overstreet v. State, 143 Fla. 794 (Fla. 1940)…nion of the assistant undertaker that the neck of the deceased was broken and there is no contradictory testimony whatsoever on this point. [*797] See Deiterle v. State, 101 Fla. 79, 134 So. 42; Lee v. State, 96 Fla. 59, 117 So. 699; Jones v. State, 65 Fla. 111, 61 So. 185; Baker v. State, 30 Fla. 41, 11 So. 492; Wharton’s Criminal Evidence, Vol. 2 (11th Ed.) 1503-5, pars. 871-2. We think it was within the province of the jury to consider and determine the question of whether or not “Nubby” Chester’s death…