RAUL H. PEREZ, APPELLANT,
v.
HUGH S. UNGER, M.D., ET AL., APPELLEES
RAUL H. PEREZ, APPELLANT,
HUGH S. UNGER, M.D., ET AL., APPELLEES
591 So. 2d 1154
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In a previous appeal, the plaintiff represented to this court that he would “adhere to the requirements for the prosecution of his case.” See Perez v. Unger, 571 So. 2d 67 (Fla.3d DCA 1990). In addition, the plaintiff was warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not meet the requirements.
Accordingly, we affirm. See Arango v. Alvarez, 585 So. 2d 1131 (Fla.3d DCA 1991).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Arango v. Alvarez, 585 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
- Perez v. Hugh S. Unger, M.D., 571 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)