CHARLES V. WOMACK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CHARLES V. WOMACK, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
592 So. 2d 388
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
REVERSED AND REMANDED. Pottgen v. State, 589 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
BOOTH, SHIVERS and MINER, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Davis, 601 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1992)…OVERTON, Justice. We quash the decision of the district court in Davis v. State, 592 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), on the authority of State v. Barnes, 595 So. 2d 22 (Fla.1992), and remand for further proceedings consistent with our decision in Barnes. It is so ordered. [*226] BARKETT, C.J. and McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, J…
-
Charles v. Womack, Jr., 617 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…ced to twenty-two months incarceration, to be followed by thirty-eight months of probation. On February 5, 1992, the conviction and sentence were reversed on the authority of Pottgen v. State, 589 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). See Womack v. State, 592 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The Pottgen opinion reveals that one of appellant’s co-defendants was granted a new trial, due to the erroneous admission of a videotape graphically depicting the condition of the “decaying, animal-ravaged remains of a body lyin…
Authorities Cited
- Pottgen v. State, 589 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)