ST. MARY'S HOSPITAL, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
KYLE DARRELL BASS, A MINOR CHILD BY AND THROUGH HIS PARENTS, DARRELL E. BASS AND STACEY BASS; DARRELL E. BASS, AND STACEY BASS, INDIVIDUALLY; DAVID W. FELD, M.D.; CASALE, SILVERMAN, FELD AND KOTZEN, M.D., P.A.; AND FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the appeals are moot because the underlying personal injury claims have been settled, rendering the issues non-justiciable.
[1] Appeals are moot when the underlying claims have been settled, even if a party argues the decision is critical to future operations.
[2] A court may decline to decide an issue when the controversy is no longer live and no claim depends on its resolution.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceParents sued healthcare providers for birth injuries, seeking a declaration that the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Act (NICA)…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Declaratory Judgment Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
These consolidated appeals emerged from a lawsuit by the parents of a child who suffered profound injuries at birth which will require lifelong care. The parents filed personal injury claims against certain health care providers and also sought a declaratory judgment that their claims against these providers were not barred by the immunity provisions of the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Act and that the Act was in any event unconstitutional. See §§ 766.301 to 766.316, Fla.Stat. (1989).
Finding it unnecessary to reach the constitutional questions, the trial court entered a declaratory decree that the immunities were unavailable to these providers because of a lack of compliance with certain alleged conditions precedent and allowed the personal injury claims to proceed to trial. It is those appeals which are involved here. After we held oral argument we received filings indicating that the parents settled their personal injury claims with the providers St. Mary’s Hospital in case No. 91-0161, and with David W. Feld, M.D., Casale, Silverman, Feld & Kotzen, M.D., P.A. in case No. 91-0181. All agree that these appeals are moot, and no one objects to the dismissal of these appeals.
Appellant Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association [NICA] argues that mootness does not affect its appeal from the declaratory judgment. It argues that a decision by this court on its appeal is “critical to the future efficient operation of the NICA plan of no fault compensation.” In particular, NICA argues that there is a jurisdictional quandary as to whether immunity avoidances must be taken up exclusively in administrative agency proceedings or can, instead, be considered in declaratory judgment proceedings in the circuit court, as here.
We prefer to decide such an issue with a continuing controversy at issue rather than, as here, with no claim dependent on its resolution. We therefore dismiss NICA’s appeal, along with the others, as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HERSEY, GUNTHER and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Byker v. Stanchina, 892 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)…urn the money to the brokerage account. A reversal of that order would accomplish nothing because there is no longer a case against the Stanchinas and because in the motion, Byker sought no relief against Lanigan. See St. Mary’s Hosp., Inc. v. Bass, 592 So. 2d 779 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Sabio v. Russell, 472 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted and the cause is dismissed as moot. DISMISSED. MONACO and TORPY, JJ„ concur.…