M.R., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1992-02-04
No. 91-501
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GERSTEN, JJ.
592 So. 2d 790 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See L.J.M. v. State, 541 So. 2d 1321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), review denied, 549 So. 2d 1014 (Fla.1989); C.J.R. v. State, 429 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), review denied, 440 So. 2d 351 (Fla.1983); K.G. v. State, 338 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. dismissed, 352 So. 2d 172 (Fla.1977).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. James, 681 So. 2d 886 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
    …erty; DOT had been involved in litigation of titles involving the 1937 tax deed to other Old State Road 4-A properties near the property at issue. Ward v. State, Dep’t of Transp., 584 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Moretti v. State, Dep’t of Transp., 592 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Thus, DOT could have discerned from that information that the tax deed conveyed the property in 1937. That property conveyance rendered DOT’s assertions of ownership pursuant to section 95.361 “completely untenable”: DOT concedes…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw