PAUL CASSO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Illegal Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Although there has been some confusion as to whether the order on appeal is pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 or 3.800(a), we treat it as being a rule 3.800(a) appeal. (The grounds argued by appellant have aspects of both ineffective assistance of counsel and illegal sentence, but it is primarily the latter.) Our analysis and disposition would be the same under either rule, and by treating this as a rule 3.800(a) appeal, we give the appellant the additional opportunity to file a brief. Appellant has done so, and pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315, we have determined that no answer brief is necessary, and that an expedited disposition is appropriate. Having considered appellant’s brief, the record on appeal, and the very thorough order of the trial court, we conclude that no error exists.
AFFIRMED.
GUNTHER, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
3299 N. Fed. Hwy., Inc. v. Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs OF Broward Cnty., 646 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…ee speech and has held that such activity can be lawfully banned in its entirely as part of the exercise of a government’s power to regulate the sale of liquor. Hoskins v. Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, 592 So. 2d 1145, 1146 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 601 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 1992). However, the second district later indicated that it may not extend that finding to hold that lap dancing is “lewd behavior” within the meaning of the criminal statutes. State v. Waller,…
-
State v. Conforti, 688 So. 2d 350 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)…First Amendment scrutiny. The second district has refused to extend First Amendment protection when a performance is beyond the realm of simple nude dancing. In Hoskins v. Department of Business Regulation, Div. of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, 592 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 601 So. 2d 552 (Fla.1992), decided the year following Barnes, the court affirmed the revocation of an alcoholic beverage license for violation of section 796.07(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1989), which proscribed operating a…
-
Matthews v. State, 664 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…episode, an evidentiary hearing is not required to determine that defendant’s sentence violates Hale. It is thus unnecessary to require that defendant refile his motion under rule 3.850. Instead, we treat this as a 3.850 appeal. See Casso v. State, 592 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Hall v. State, 643 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, we reverse and remand this case with instructions that defendant’s enhanced sentences be ordered to run concurrently. GLICKSTEIN and FARMER, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence