PHILLIP SALLAS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Sallas v. State, No. 90-1810 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec. 10, 1990) (unpublished order), which certified the same question of great public importance answered by this Court in Godwin v. State, 593 So. 2d 211 (Fla.1992). The order below is quashed and this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Godwin.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, MCDONALD, GRIMES and HARDING, JJ., concur. BARKETT, J., concurs in result only.
KOGAN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion, in which SHAW, C.J., and BARKETT, J., concur.
KOGAN,' Justice,
concurring in part, dissenting in part.
I concur that this opinion must be quashed and remanded. However, I would order the court below to apply the standard developed in my separate opinion in Godwin v. State, 593 So. 2d 211 (Fla.1992) (Ko-gan, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part).
SHAW, C.J., and BARKETT, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (145 total)
-
Fridman v. Safeco Ins. Co. OF Ill., 185 So. 3d 1214 (Fla. 2016)…limits: ' “An issue is moot when the controversy has been so fully resolved that a judicial determination can have no actual effect. A case'is ‘moot’ when’it'presents no actual controversy or when the issues have ceased to exist.” Godwin v. State, 593 So. 2d 211, 212 (Fla.1992) (citations omitted). The damage issue is not moot because a verdict in excess of the policy limits is evidence and a recoverable measure of damages in the subsequent bad faith action, and Fridman had the right to seek such a verdict…
-
Herman v. Herman, 751 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…to alimony.” Because the abatement period has already expired and a decision regarding the propriety of the lower court’s order will not, at this juncture, directly affect the parties’ interest, we find the matter to be moot. See Godwin v. State, 593 So. 2d 211 (Fla.1992); Lund v. Department of Health, 708 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek further relief in the trial court as provided for in the order appealed from. Appeal di…
-
Aery v. Wallace Lincoln-Mercury, LLC, 118 So. 3d 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…tisfy the standing requirement, “the plaintiff must show that a case or controversy exists between the plaintiff and the defendant.” United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Diagnostics of S. Fla., Inc., 921 So. 2d 23, 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (citing Godwin v. State, 593 So. 2d 211 (Fla.1992); Montgomery v. Dept. of Health Rehabilitative Servs., 468 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)). “In its broadest sense, standing is no more than having, or representing one who has, a sufficient stake in an otherwise justiciable controversy t…
Previewing 3 of 145 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Godwin v. State, 593 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1992)