JAMES REEVES, III, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1991-11-19
No. 90-3336
JOANOS, C.J., and WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.
593 So. 2d 232 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1991) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS, C.J., and WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur. ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for certification is granted, and we hereby certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following questions:

Does section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989), authorize habitual felon sentencing for a criminal defendant who has previously been convicted of a violent offense enumerated in the statute, but who is currently being sentenced for a non-violent offense?

2. If section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989), authorizes habitual felon sentencing for a criminal defendant who is currently being sentenced for a non-violent offense, does the statute violate the constitutional principles of equal protection, due process, double jeopardy, or ex post facto?

JOANOS, C.J., and WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Reeves v. State, 612 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 1992)
    …OVERTON, Justice. We have for review Reeves v. State, 593 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), in which the district court affirmed Reeves’ sentence as a habitual violent felony offender and certified the following questions as being of great public importance: 1. Does section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989), authorize…
  • Penton v. State, 605 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
    …rtance: DOES SECTION 775.084, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS AGAINST DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND EX POST FACTO? See Funchess v. State, 597 So. 2d 985 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), pet. for rev. pending, No. 79,963; Reeves v. State, 593 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), pet. for rev. pending, No. 79,386; Tillman v. State, 586 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), pet. for rev. pending, No. 78,715. Convictions AFFIRMED, sentences partially VACATED, and REMANDED. SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ„ concur.…
  • Hale v. State, 600 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
    …No. 78,715 (Fla.1991); Raulerson v. State, 589 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), jurisdiction accepted, 593 So. 2d 1052 (Fla.1992), review pending, No. 79,051; Becker v. State, 592 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (question certified); Reeves v. State, 593 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (question certified). Again, however, pursuant to Rule 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, we certify the following questions to be of great public importance: 1. Does it violate a defendant’s substantive du…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw