UNISYS FINANCE CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
AMP SERVICES, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment which denied enforcement of a guaranty.
Gordon and Robbie Case entered into a contract to guaranty certain payments to appellant in the event of default by their corporation, AMP Services, Inc. The guaranty is unconditional and promises to pay in the event their corporation does not.
Because the corporation failed to make the payments the Cases were called upon to honor their guaranty. They did not and because of that appellant is entitled to a judgment for the balance due from the corporation to appellant in the amount of $19,090.55.
That portion of the judgment denying enforcement of the guaranty in the amount of $19,090.55 is reversed and this cause is remanded for entry of judgment for appellant.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
GOSHORN, C.J., and DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Reeves v. State, 612 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 1992)…OVERTON, Justice. We have for review Reeves v. State, 593 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), in which the district court affirmed Reeves’ sentence as a habitual violent felony offender and certified the following questions as being of great public importance: 1. Does section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989), authorize…
-
Penton v. State, 605 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…rtance: DOES SECTION 775.084, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS AGAINST DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND EX POST FACTO? See Funchess v. State, 597 So. 2d 985 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), pet. for rev. pending, No. 79,963; Reeves v. State, 593 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), pet. for rev. pending, No. 79,386; Tillman v. State, 586 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), pet. for rev. pending, No. 78,715. Convictions AFFIRMED, sentences partially VACATED, and REMANDED. SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ„ concur.…
-
Hale v. State, 600 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…No. 78,715 (Fla.1991); Raulerson v. State, 589 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), jurisdiction accepted, 593 So. 2d 1052 (Fla.1992), review pending, No. 79,051; Becker v. State, 592 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (question certified); Reeves v. State, 593 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (question certified). Again, however, pursuant to Rule 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, we certify the following questions to be of great public importance: 1. Does it violate a defendant’s substantive du…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence