DWAYNE ROBERTS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1992-02-18
No. 91-62
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.
593 So. 2d 323 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Jones v. State, 477 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (defendant not entitled to hearing when state supplied all information in its possession). See also Freeman v. State, 494 So. 2d 270, 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (absent discovery violation, hearing not required), receded from on other grounds, Harris v. State, 544 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gonzalez v. State, 855 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Roberts v. State, 593 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Jones v. State, 477 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)(defendant not entitled to hearing regarding State’s alleged failure to disclose information where State supplied defendant with all information in its possession).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw