UNIDINIAL MERCANTILE CORPORATION, A PANAMANIAN CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
MANUFACTURERS' HANOVER TRUST COMPANY OF FLORIDA, A FLORIDA CHARTERED TRUST COMPANY, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1992-02-18
No. 91-801
Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.
593 So. 2d 323 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Unidinial sued Manufacturers’ Hanover Trust for mismanaging its discretionary investment portfolio. Manufacturers’ Hanover was granted a summary judgment on its affirmative defense that Unidinial had ratified actions of Manufacturers’ which violated the investment criteria established by the parties. •

We agree with Unidinial that, on the ratification defense, Manufacturers' failed to show the nonexistence of issues of material fact. John Sawyer’s Book Co. v. City Nat’l Bank of Miami, 542 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Specifically, there is a triable issue of fact whether Unidinial’s failure to timely disapprove of Manufacturers’ unauthorized transactions was caused by misrepresentations or material omissions of the defendant. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Cheng, 901 F. 2d 1124 (D.C.Cir.1990).

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gonzalez v. State, 855 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Roberts v. State, 593 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Jones v. State, 477 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)(defendant not entitled to hearing regarding State’s alleged failure to disclose information where State supplied defendant with all information in its possession).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw