ALBERT A. CARTER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Albert A. Carter, a fugitive from New York arrested in Florida under an assumed name, sought habeas corpus relief challenging his extradition. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's order remanding him to New York, holding that the identity of the fugitive was established and the extradition proceedings complied with law.
The court held that the petitioner's identity was amply sustained by the evidence and that the executive warrant was issued in substantial compliance with law. The court affirmed the order directing the petitioner's delivery to New York's custody.
“Any conflicts or discrepancies that may appear in the evidence have been passed upon by the trial court and his finding as to the identity of the petitioner is amply sustained by the evidence.”
Establishes that the trial court's finding of identity was sufficiently supported by the record and not subject to reversal.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJ. A. Thompson, indicted for grand larceny in the first degree in New York, was arrested in St. Augustine, Florida under the assumed name Albert A. Ca…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fugitive From Justice cases and more on FLexlaw
Whitfield, J.
The writ of error herein was allowed and taken to an order remanding a petitioner in habeas corpus proceedings before the Judge of the Fourth Judicial Circuit.
It appears from the papers presented by the petitioner on this writ of error that J. A. Thompson, alias Lewis Hall, was indicted for the crime of grand larceny in the first degree in the State of New York. An application was made to the Governor of New York “for a requisition upon the Governor of the State of Florida for J. A. Thompson, alias Lewis Hall, arrested in St. Augustine (Florida) under the name of Albert A. Carter.” The Governor of New York issued a requisition on the Governor of Florida for “J. A. Thompson, alias Lewis Hall, alias Albert A. Carter.” The Governor of Florida issued a warrant stating that “Whereas, the executive authority of the State of New York has demanded of the executive authority of the State of Florida the delivery and surrender of the body of J. A. Thompson, alias Lewis Hall, alias Albert A. Carter, as a fugitive from justice from said State of New York to said State of Florida, and has produced and filed with the executive authority of said State of Florida, to which said State said J. A. Thompson, alias Lewis Hall, alias Albert A. Carter, has fled from the State of New York, a copy of indictment charging the said person so demanded with having committed in said State of New York against the laws of said State of New York the crime of grand larceny in the first degree and which is certified as authentic by the Governor of said State of New York.
NOW, THEREFORE, This is to command you to apprehend and arrest the body of the said J. A. Thompson, alias Lewis Hall, alias Albert A. Carter, and deliver his said body to James J. Gegan, agent of the said State of New York, duly authorized and empowered to receive and convey the said J. A. Thompson, alias Lewis Hall, alias A. A. Carter, to the State of New York, then and there to be surrendered to the legal authorities of said State, to be dealt with according to law.”
The petitioner being held in custody applied for a writ of habeas corpus. At the hearing the warrant is-used by the Governor was presented and testimony as to the identity of the petitioner was taken. The court ordered the petitioner to be delivered to the agent of the State of New York. On writ of error it is contended that the identity of the petitioner was not shown and that “the judge erred in not inquiring into the sufficiency of the judicial proceedings upon which the requisition and warrant are based.”
The bill of exceptions contains evidence that the petitioner was known as J. A. Thompson, alias Lewis Hall, and that he was also known as Albert A. Carter; and that the petitioner is the identical person who is charged with the crime for which the requisition was requested and issued under the law. Any conflicts or discrepancies that may appear in the evidence have been passed upon by the trial court and his finding as to the identity of the petitioner is amply sustained by the evidence.
It does not appear from the bill of exceptions thaf the petitioner offered at the hearing below anything to show that the executive warrant was not based upon proper proceedings. The petitioner has presented here papers that show the executive warrant was issued upon proceedings as stated above in this opinion; and such proceedings are in substantial compliance with law.
In allowing writs of error in habeas corpus cases, the judge would facilitate the administration of justice by directing that the writ be made returnable at the earliest practicable day in order to avoid needless delays in these important proceedings. The writ in this case was allowed on December 21, 1912. It was issued the same day and as directed by praecipe was made returnable on March 10, 1913, which has caused an unnecessary delay.
The order directing that the petitioner be delivered to the custody of the accredited agent of the State of New York is affirmed.
Shackleford, C. J., and Taylor, Cockrell and Hocker, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The State of Fla. ex rel. Harlis Sellers v. Parker, 87 Fla. 181 (Fla. 1924)…nt for a period of not less than sixty days; for the third and subsequent offense for a period of ninety days.” The petitioner was remanded and was allowed and took writ of error under the statute. Sec. 3580, Rev. Gen. Stats. 1920; Carter v. State, 65 Fla. 347, 61 South. Rep. 591. It is contended here that the ordinance “is unconstitutional because it denies petitioner the right of trial by [*186] jury, and provides for imprisonment as a punishment and not as an alternative -in default of the payment of…
-
Arnold v. E. E. Boyce as Sheriff of St. Johns Cnty., 97 Fla. 484 (Fla. 1929)…n recess but the June Term of the Court of 1928 had not adjourned and the session thereof continued without adjournment up until the beginning of the succeeding term which began on the second Tuesday in January, 1929. This Court in Carter v. State, 65 Fla. 347, 61 So. R. 591, say: “In allowing writs of error in habeas corpus cases, the judge would facilitate the administration of justice by directing that the writ be made returnable at the earliest practicable day, in order to avoid needless delays in the…