DERRICK CHARLES LARRY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Appellee moves for leave to file a notice of cross appeal fourteen months after the appellant filed the notice of appeal. We deny the motion without prejudice to serve an amended motion which sets forth good cause as required by Walker v. State, 457 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
The filing period for a notice of cross appeal by the state in a criminal case is procedural rather than jurisdictional. The filing period may be extended for good cause where the defendant will not suffer prejudice or be deprived of adequate notice. Walker at 1137. Here, the state has not shown good cause for the fourteen months’ delay. Accordingly, the motion is denied without prejudice to serve an amended motion which complies with Walker. JOANOS, C.J., and ZEHMER and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Fam. Bank OF Hallandale, 623 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 1993)…McDonald, justice. We review State v. Family Bank of Hallandale, 593 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 1st DCA1992), because of conflict with Town of Bithlo v. Bank of Commerce, 92 Fla. 975, 110 So. 837 (1926). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. The issues are whether state warrants are negotiable…
-
State v. Fam. Bank OF Hallandale, 667 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…3 So. 2d 474, 476 (Fla.1993) (“unlike negotiable paper, [a warrant] is open to any defense which might have been made to the claim in the hands of the original holder”), which quashed this court’s original effort, State v. Family Bank of Hallandale, 593 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), requires reversal. Counsel stipulated at oral argument that Ted’s Sheds, Inc., and Ted’s Sheds of Bro-ward, Inc., should be viewed for purposes of decision as one and the same entity. This stipulation, which I write in part to…
Authorities Cited
- Walker v. State, 457 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)