RICHARD GENE FLORENCE, APPELLANT,
v.
WALTON COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RICHARD GENE FLORENCE, APPELLANT,
WALTON COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEE
593 So. 2d 1217
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The trial court was correct in finding that the amended complaint for mandamus failed to allege sufficient facts which would demonstrate that exhaustion of administrative remedies would be futile. Skaggs-Albertson’s Properties v. Michels Belleair Bluff's Pharmacy, Inc., 332 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1976).1
Affirmed.
WIGGINTON, BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ., concur. . We also note that in cases which involve substantial rights of third parties and factual issues related to those rights (revocation of building permits) that a petition for writ of mandamus may not be an appropriate remedy. See City of Deland v. State, 423 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Immer v. City OF Miami, 898 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…the determination of controverted questions of faet[ ].” State ex rel. Blatt v. Panelfab Int’l Corp., 314 So. 2d 196, 198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); see also Morse Diesel, 698 So. 2d at 312; City of Deland, 423 So. 2d at 530-31; Florence v. Walton County, 593 So. 2d 1217, 1218 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Skaggs-Albertson's Props., Inc. v. Michels Belleair Bluffs Pharmacy, Inc., 332 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)
- Waite v. State, 423 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
- The City OF DeLAND v. The State of Fla. ex rel. C. Allen Watts, 423 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)