DERRICK L. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court committed reversible error by refusing to instruct the jury on the permissive lesser included offense of sale of cocaine.
The defendant was convicted of trafficking in over 400 grams of cocaine based on a jury verdict. The evidence presented at trial tended to establish a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Permissive Lesser Included Offense cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by the defendant Derrick L. Williams from an adjudication of guilt and sentence for the first-degree felony of trafficking in over 400 grams of cocaine [§ 893.135(l)(b)l.c., Fla.Stat. (1989) ] which was entered upon an adverse jury verdict. We reverse for a new trial.
The state concedes, and we agree, that it was error for the trial court to refuse to instruct the jury on the permissive lesser included offense of sale of cocaine [§ 893.13(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989)], a second-degree felony, because the information herein alleged a sale of cocaine and the evidence adduced at trial tended to establish such a sale. See Amado v. State, 585 So. 2d 282 (Fla.1991) (simple possession of cocaine held a permissive lesser included offense of trafficking in cocaine where the information alleged possession of cocaine and the evidence adduced at trial tended to establish such possession). Contrary to the state’s contention, however, we conclude that this error was reversible and not harmless because the refused lesser offense of sale of cocaine [a second-degree felony] was “one step” removed from the offense with which the defendant was charged and convicted, to wit: trafficking in cocaine [a first-degree felony]. It is settled that the refusal to instruct the jury on an otherwise proper lesser included offense which is “one step” removed from the offense with which the defendant is charged and convicted, as here, constitutes per se reversible error. State v. Abreau, 363 So. 2d 1063, 1064 (Fla.1978).
We find no merit in the balance of the defendant’s points on appeal. The final judgments of conviction and sentence under review are reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Efrain Torres v. State, 695 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)…State, 585 So. 2d 282, 282 (Fla.1991)(“An instruction on a permissive lesser included offense must be given Vhen the pleadings and the evidence demonstrate that the lesser included offense is included in the offense charged.’ ”); Williams v. State, 594 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)(same). Reversed and remanded for a new trial.…
-
Perez v. State, 709 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…dant was ultimately convicted. State v. Abreau, 363 So. 2d 1063 (Fla.1978). See Torres v. State, 695 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (reversing conviction for trafficking because of failure to give instruction on simple possession); Williams v. State, 594 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (sale of cocaine is only one step removed from trafficking in more than 400 grams of cocaine). This error requires a new trial. REVERSED and REMANDED. GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur. . He was also convicted of two counts of de…
Authorities Cited
- Grant v. State, 363 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 1978)
- Amado v. State, 585 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 1991)