CHARLES D. FREEMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CHARLES D. FREEMAN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
594 So. 2d 834
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment and sentence. However, in our review of the record, we find no written order to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement imposing a fee for the public defender service at the sentencing hearing. We, therefore, remand this case to the trial court to correct the judgment and sentence to conform with its oral pronouncement.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bauman v. State, 600 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…fees in the amount of $150. The trial court, however, failed to include the public defender fees in the judgment and sentence. Thus the trial court must correct the judgment and sentence to conform with its oral pronouncement. See Freeman v. State, 594 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Third, Bauman’s order of community control and his written disposition and commitment form reflect imposition of court costs in the amount of $461 as to the driving under the influence conviction. The disposition and commitment…
-
Elihjah Anthony McKNIGHT v. State, 616 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)…PER CURIAM. We affirm appellant’s revocation of probation but remand for correction of the written order to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement with respect to the public defender’s fee. See, e.g., Freeman v. State, 594 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). LEHAN, C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.…