STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
ERIC RYAN GOODMAN, RESPONDENT
STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
ERIC RYAN GOODMAN, RESPONDENT
595 So. 2d 19
Florida Supreme Court (1992)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
[*20] OVERTON, Judge.
We quash the decision of the district court in Goodman v. State, 578 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), on the authority of State v. Barnes, 595 So. 2d 22 (Fla.1992),1 and remand for further proceedings consistent with our decision in Barnes.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, C.J., and McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. . The 1989 amendment to section 775.-084(l)(a)l, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988), did not change the plain meaning of the statute.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nealy v. State, 652 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)…unded suspicion to address questions to a citizen, such an encounter becomes nonconsensual when the officer prevents the citizen from exercising his right to walk away. Watts v. State, 578 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 1st DCA), quashed in part on other grounds, 595 So. 2d 19 (Fla.1992); Hill v. State, 561 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). The activities in the instant case did not give rise to a well-founded suspicion needed to justify a stop and detention. The officers interfered with Nealy’s liberty based on conduct whi…
-
Antoine L. McBRIDE v. State, 665 So. 2d 329 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…iver,6 were charged in the same 1989 information. The third felony conviction was for 1988 aggravated battery with a firearm.7 Since defendant had three prior felony convictions, he was properly sentenced as an habitual offender. See State v. Watts, 595 So. 2d 19 (Fla.1992). Apparently, forgetting the 1988 aggravated battery conviction, the defendant argues that the trial court improperly considered the two 1989 convictions for purposes of habitualization because they were nonse-quential convictions. See St…
-
Goodman v. State, 595 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…he second issue to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has now quashed our decision on the second issue, and remanded to this court for further proceedings consistent with the decision in State v. Barnes, 595 So. 2d 22 (Fla.1992). State v. Goodman, 595 So. 2d 19 (Fla.1992). Based upon Barnes, we vacate and set aside our previous opinion, and affirm the trial court on both issues. AFFIRMED. ERVIN, ZEHMER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Barnes, 595 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 1992)
- Goodman v. State, 578 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)