LAURENCE SIMONE, APPELLANT,
v.
SARA CARIDAD DAMARE, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court abused its discretion by denying the motion to set aside the default judgment.
The defendant moved to set aside a default judgment, arguing excusable neglect and a meritorious defense. The plaintiff was not prejudiced by the dela…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Setting Aside Default Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The defendant below, Laurence Simone, appeals from the trial court’s non-final order denying his motion to set aside default. We reverse.
The court in Zimmerman v. Vinylgrain Industries of Jacksonville, Inc., 464 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), has succinctly and correctly stated the law regarding the setting aside of defaults as follows:
The Florida Supreme Court has established a policy of providing relief from defaults and allowing trials on the merits. If there is any reasonable doubt in the matter of vacating a default, it should be resolved in favor of granting the application and allowing the trial upon the merits. Northshore [sic] Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, 143 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1962). Although an abuse of discretion is necessary in order to reverse a trial court’s ruling on a motion to vacate default, appellate courts need not find as great a showing of abuse to reverse a trial court’s denial of a motion to vacate default as they do to reverse a grant of such a motion. Garcia Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Diaz, 351 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).
In the instant case, the defendant did not immediately move to set aside the default. However, during this period, discovery was continuously taking place. As a result, the plaintiff was not prejudiced as a result of the delay. Additionally, the defendant below raised a meritorious defense and established excusable neglect. See North Shore Hosp., Inc. v. Barber, 143 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1962); B.C. Builders Supply Co. v. Maldonado, 405 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Accordingly, the trial court abused its discretion in failing to set aside the default.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Lecount, 601 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…[*230] PER CURIAM. We reverse based on the authority of Simone v. Damare, 595 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.…
-
Doga Corp. v. Federico Sarria and Maria Del Carmen Sarria, 858 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court’s order vacating the default against Doga Corporation and granting Doga relief from the previously entered final judgment and orders reforming the mortgage, all based on the default. In Simone v. Damare, 595 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) this court stated: The Florida Supreme Court has established a policy of providing relief from defaults and allowing trials on the merits. If there is any reasonable doubt in the matter of vacating a default, it should be resolve…
Authorities Cited
- N. Shore Hosp., Inc. v. Barber, 143 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1962)
- B. C. Builders Supply Co., Inc. v. Maldonado, 405 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Garcia Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Diaz, 351 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)
- Ward D. Zimmerman v. Vinylgrain Indus. OF Jacksonville, Inc., 464 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)