CORNELIO MARTINEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CORNELIO MARTINEZ, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
595 So. 2d 582
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of Mr. Martinez’s motion to suppress. We strike condition 6 from the written order of probation because it does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing. Tillman v. State, 592 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). The written order of probation is otherwise affirmed.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sirmons v. State, 620 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. 1993)…HARDING, Justice. We have for review Sirmons v. State, 595 So. 2d 582, 582 (Fla.2d DCA 1992), in which the Second District Court of Appeal recognized conflict with Lang v. State, 566 So. 2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We find conflict between the district courts and accept jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b…
-
Matrion Croskey v. State, 601 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…indings concerning the juvenile’s suitability for adult sanctions. In following Davis, we have acknowledged conflict with Lang v. State, 566 So. 2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). See Pittman v. State, 595 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Sirmons v. State, 595 So. 2d 582 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). In Lang, the Fifth District held that a juvenile, by entering a negotiated plea, does not necessarily waive the requirement that the trial court consider the enumerated criteria and make the required findings under section 39.11…
Authorities Cited
- Tillman v. State, 592 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)