HUGHES ZAMIR, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1992-04-10
No. 91-1582
SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
595 So. 2d 1120 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1992) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2204, 115 L.Ed.2d 158 (1991); Traylor v. State, 596 So. 2d 957 (Fla.1992); State v. Lints, 596 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Mitchell v. State, 620 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 1993)
    …PER CURIAM. We review Mitchell v. State, 595 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), wherein the district court cited as controlling authority Joiner v. State, 593 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), which we accepted for review. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So. 2d 418 (…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw