XAVIER SMITH JACKSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence seized after a traffic stop for a non-functioning tail light.
The appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine seized after a police officer stopped the automobile he was driving for a non-functioning tail li…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Reasonable Suspicion For Traffic Stop cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The appellant appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine seized after a police officer stopped an automobile the appellant was driving. Because we agree with the appellant’s argument that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the cocaine, we reverse the conviction and sentence.
The only justification offered by the prosecution for the stop of the appellant’s automobile was the officer’s observation of a minor traffic infraction, a non-functioning tail light. When the prosecution relies solely upon a minor traffic violation as justification for the stop of an automobile, it has the burden of showing that a reasonable officer would have stopped the vehicle under such circumstances. Kehoe v. State, 521 So. 2d 1094 (Fla.1988). Our review of the evidence presented below reveals no factual basis for the trial court to have found that the prosecution met this burden. In the absence of such evidence, the motion to-suppress should have been granted.
The judgment of conviction and sentence are reversed and the cause is remanded. Because the granting of the motion to suppress is dispositive of the cause, we direct that the trial court discharge the appellant.
SMITH, ZEHMER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Daniel v. State, 647 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…ourt must interpret the evidence, and reasonable inferences therefrom, in a light most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s ruling. Owen v. State, 560 So. 2d 207 (Fla.1990). Nevertheless, reversal is required in this case. In Jackson v. State, 596 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), this court held, on the authority of Kehoe v. State, 521 So. 2d 1094 (Fla.1988), that [w]hen the prosecution relies solely upon a minor traffic violation as justification for the stop of an automobile, it has the burden of show…
-
Davis v. State, 605 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…n this case, when the state relies solely upon a minor traffic violation as justification for the stop of an automobile, it has the burden of showing that a reasonable officer would have stopped the vehicle under the circumstances. Jackson v. State, 596 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Our review of the record reveals that the state failed to offer evidence to sustain its burden. The trial court erred in denying Davis’ motion to suppress. Reversed HALL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J„ concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Kehoe v. State, 521 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 1988)