STEVEN R. KRUEGER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1992-04-15
No. 91-02520
CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
596 So. 2d 528 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1992)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that while probation conditions were proper, the order for restitution for dead trees was erroneous.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant pled nolo contendere to grand theft and was placed on probation with restitution ordered. He challenged two probation conditions and the res…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
SCHOONOVER, Chief Judge.

SCHOONOVER, Chief Judge.

The appellant, Steven R. Krueger, challenges the judgment and sentence imposed upon him after he pled nolo contendere to a charge of grand theft. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

After the court accepted the appellant’s plea of nolo contendere to the charge filed against him, the court placed the appellant on probation and ordered him to pay a large sum of restitution. The appellant contends that two of the conditions of probation placed upon him were improper and that the court erred in ordering him to pay for the replacement of certain dead trees.

The appellant has not shown that the conditions of probation imposed upon him were improper. Erickson v. State, 565 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), review denied, 576 So. 2d 286 (Fla.1991). We, accordingly, affirm the trial court in that regard.

The trial court erred, however, when it ordered the appellant to pay the sum of $450 for the replacement of certain dead trees. Ahnen v. State, 565 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We, accordingly, remand with instructions to delete this amount from the restitution order. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw