HERBERT WHIPPLE, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1992-04-02
No. 76475
SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.
596 So. 2d 669 Florida Supreme Court (1992) Negative Treatment
Cited by 10 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review State v. Whipple, 592 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), in which the Third District Court of Appeal certified the following question as one of great public importance:

SHOULD POPE V. STATE [561 So. 2d 554] BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY TO SENTENCES IMPOSED PRIOR TO APRIL 26, 1990?

We accept jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. In Smith v. State, 598 So. 2d 1063 (Fla.1992), we answered this question in the affirmative.

In the instant case, the district court correctly applied Pope retroactively by finding that even though the judge orally stated the reasons for a downward departure, the trial judge failed to provide contemporaneous written reasons. The district court correctly vacated the sentence and remanded the case for resentencing. Accordingly, we uphold the decision below.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, barkett, grimes, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …la.1994); Seifert v. State, 636 So. 2d 716 (Fla.1994); Feller v. State, 637 So. 2d 911 (Fla.1994); State v. Townsend, 635 So. 2d 949 (Fla.1994); Hopkins v. State, 632 So. 2d 1372 (Fla.1994); State v. Jones, 625 So. 2d 821 (Fla.1993); State v. Kopko, 596 So. 2d 669 (Fla.1992); Pardo v. State, 596 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 1992); Perez v. State, 536 So. 2d 206 (Fla.1988); Glendening v. State, 536 So. 2d 212 (Fla.1988); State v. Jano, 524 So. 2d 660 (Fla.1988). There is an on going debate about the reliability of childr…
  • Pease v. State, 712 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 1997)
    …is committed where a trial judge orally pronounces departure reasons at sentencing but does not reduce them to writing until five business days later. Moreover, this rule has been applied to both upward and downward departures. In Whipple v. State, 596 So. 2d 669 (Fla.1992), we held that even though the judge orally stated the reasons for a downward departure, the failure to provide contemporaneous written reasons invalidated the departure. See also Branam v. State, 554 So. 2d 512, 513 (Fla.1990) (“Unless up…
  • Adkins v. State, 605 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
    …Judge. Raising two points on appeal, appellant, Wayne Adkins, seeks review of his conviction on four counts of sexual battery upon a child under twelve years of age. We affirm. Citing to Kopko v. State, 577 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), quashed, 596 So. 2d 669 (Fla.1992), appellant first argues that the trial court erred in permitting more than one witness to testify as to the child victim’s prior consistent statements regarding sexual abuse. We find no merit in this argument and affirm on this point with…

Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw