MICHAEL GEORGE BRUNO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
We agree with appellant that at resentencing the trial court erred in directing that his sentence for armed robbery be served consecutive to his sentence for homicide. At the original sentencing hearing the robbery sentence was ordered to be served concurrent with the homicide sentence. In the absence of unusual circumstances, not present here, the sentence could not properly be changed to a consecutive sentence. See Tannihill v. State, 559 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Pahud v. State, 370 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for correction of appellant’s sentence as provided herein. 574 So. 2d 76.
ANSTEAD, HERSEY and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lenahan v. Russell L. Forkey, P.A., 702 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)…ages only, the burden at this stage in the proceedings is on Forkey, as the moving party, to establish the absence of justiciable issues of fact and his entitlement to summary judgment. See Galloway v. Law Offices of Merkle, Bright & Sullivan, P.A., 596 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). While Forkey may be able to show that his representation of the client did not preclude the client from prevailing in the Virginia lawsuit, he has not done so at this time. It will be the client’s burden to establish that he su…
-
Britt Norton v. State, 731 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…. DELL and GROSS, JJ., concur. . Duggins v. United States, 240 F. 2d 479 (6th Cir. 1957); Kennedy v. United States, 330 F. 2d 26 (9th Cir. 1964). . Neither are McMullen, Williamson v. State, 569 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), or Bruno v. State, 596 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), all of which relied on Pahud.…
-
Dep't OF Transp. v. Spioch, 642 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…at the occurrence was an “unusual, extraordinary or bizarre circumstance.” For these reasons, we hold that the trial court correctly denied the Department’s motion for summary judgment. See Galloway v. Law Offices of Merkle, Bright and Sullivan, PA, 596 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Williams v. McNeil, 442 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). III. The Department’s remaining points challenge the trial court’s denial of its motions for directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The following…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Bruno v. State, 574 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 1991)
- Pahud v. State, 370 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)
- Tannihill v. State, 559 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)