CITY OF TAMPA, PETITIONER,
v.
JOE RICHARD REDNER, EDITH ANN BURNS AND MARY B. FERNANDEZ, RESPONDENTS
PER CURIAM.
In this petition for writ of certiorari, we review a decision of the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity. In the appeal before it, the circuit court reversed a county court decision which had found valid Tampa City Ordinance 8482-A. In reversing, the circuit court ruled that Ordinance 8482-A, which promulgated Chapter 43A of the Tampa Zoning Code was invalidly enacted because the City failed to comply with the requirements of section 166.-041(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1983). We find that the circuit court did not depart from the essential requirements of law and, accordingly, deny the petition. Combs v. State, 436 So. 2d 93 (Fla.1983).
DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Vazquez v. Milady Martinez, 175 So. 3d 372 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)…sess the potential bias of the witness.”). On the other hand, introducing the subject of insurance where insurance is not a proper issue constitutes prejudicial error. Heirera v. Moustafa, 96 So. 3d 1020, 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Nicaise v. Gagnon, 597 So. 2d 305, 306 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the challenged evidence. Whether the party has a direct relationship with any of the experts does not determine whether discovery of the doctor/law fi…
-
Suarez-Burgos v. Morhaim, 745 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…ine whether the trial judge abused his discretion, to wit, “discretion is abused only where no reasonable [person] would take the view adopted by the trial court.” Huff v. State, 569 So. 2d 1247, 1249 (Fla.1990). Id. at 1111. See Nicaise v. Gagnon, 597 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (treating an order granting a mistrial as an order granting a new trial). While I agree with the majority that a trial court has broad discretion in deciding whether to grant a new trial, or in this case a post-verdict mistrial,…
-
George v. Mann, 622 So. 2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…orden, Inc. v. Young, 479 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), rev. denied, 488 So. 2d 832 (Fla.1986). The improper remarks cannot be deemed harmless in light of the truly contradictory evidence on the issue of the dog’s ownership. See Nicaise v. Gagnon, 597 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA) (improper closing argument cannot be deemed harmless where issue to be decided by jury is close), rev. denied, 604 So. 2d 487 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial. . See generally §§ 767.01 and 767.04, Fla.…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Combs v. State, 436 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1983)