DAVID GAWRON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DAVID GAWRON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
597 So. 2d 340
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1992)
Caution
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
HALL, Acting Chief Judge.
We find merit only in Gawron’s argument that he was improperly ordered to pay $100 to the Hillsborough County Court Improvement Fund without being afforded adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard. Siplin v. State, 584 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
Accordingly, we strike the $100 without prejudice to the state to seek to reimpose this cost after giving Gawron proper notice and an opportunity to be heard.
Gawron’s judgments and sentences are affirmed, but the $100 cost is stricken.
PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Abel Oliveros Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)…221 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Varela v. State, 550 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Zachary v. State, 559 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Siplin v. State, 584 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Alfonso v. State, 595 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Gawron v. State, 597 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Williams v. State, 601 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Reberv. State, 611 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Douglas v. State, 627 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Berry v. State, 636 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Carr v. State, 642 So.…
-
Puff 'N Stuff OF Winter Park, Inc. v. Bell, 683 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)…y the Dietels and Puff ’N Stuff on the ground that any such claim is barred by the provisions of section 687.0304(2), the “banking statute of frauds.” The impetus for enacting section 687.0304(2) was explained in Brenow-itz v. Central National Bank, 597 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992): This statute has been labelled by a commentator as a “new” statute of frauds which was enacted to protect lenders from liability for actions or statements a lender might make in the context of counseling or negotiating with the…
-
Vargas v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co., 104 So. 3d 1156 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…doctrine even where the lower court's reasoning is incorrect or when the basis of our affirmance was not argued.”). . Florida’s banking statute of frauds is based on Minnesota’s credit agreement statute of frauds. See Brenowitz v. Cent. Nat'l Bank, 597 So. 2d 340, 342 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Minnesota's statute similarly provides that "a debtor may not maintain an action on a credit [*1169] agreement unless the agreement is in writing, expresses consideration, sets forth the relevant terms and conditions, and is…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Columbus Ferry Siplin v. State, 584 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)