SAUL PUNDIK, APPELLANT,

v.

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Kennedy v. Kennedy, 622 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)
  …living would approach (although the trial judge said he realized it would never equal) the standard of living enjoyed during the parties’ long-term marriage.1 That is clearly a valid function for a permanent alimony award. See, e.g., Bible v. Bible, 597 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Womble v. Womble, 546 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). I am concerned that trial judges in this district will read this majority opinion and conclude that if a former spouse has worked during the course of the marriage, or holds a…
• Hill v. Hooten, 776 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
  …. Cardillo is entitled to maintain is a pivotal consideration in any alimony analysis. A review of the decisions on this issue indicates that the. standard to be considered is the most recent standard of living shared by the parties. Bible v. Bible, 597 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Lanier v. Lanier, 594 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Pfaffko v.. Pfaffko, 559 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). The trial court’s refusal to exam [*1008] ine the parties’ most recent standard of living, a standard they enjoyed for…
• McLEAN v. McLEAN, 652 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
  …e conditions would warrant an extension or modification of the rehabilitative alimony, or shift of such award to permanent alimony. See Steinberg v. Steinberg, 614 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 626 So. 2d 208 (Fla.1993); Bible v. Bible, 597 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Especially when a party has not been employed outside the home for many years, the trial court should take care to structure a rehabilitative plan that can be objectively reassessed near the end of the rehabilitative term. Despi…