ST. PETERSBURG NOVELTY WORKS, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,

v.

E. L. BATTLE AND L. M. BATTLE, JOINED BY THEIR RESPECTIVE HUSBANDS G. C. BATTLE AND F. S. BATTLE, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR

Citator

Cited By

• Valentine v. Hayes, 102 Fla. 157 (Fla. 1931)
  …ar on the instrument in connection with the indorsement. There is no authority for setting up such matters as a legal defense when sued at law on the indorsement. This does not conflict with the previous holdings of this Court in Dicks vs. Johnson, 66 Fla. 306, 63 So. 700 and Davis vs. Leighton, 80 Fla. 594, 86 So. 564, where the point involved was the right of an indorsee as against Ms immediate indorser to plead a failure of consideration for the indorsement, which is not the ease dealt with in this opi…
• Roess Lumber Co. v. State Exch. Bank, 68 Fla. 324 (Fla. 1914)
  …atutes of Florida, which we had occasion to discuss somewhat in Taylor v. American National Bank of Pensacola, 63 Fla. 631, 57 South. Rep. 678; Jones v. Manitowoc Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co., 65 Fla. 467, 62 South. Rep. Rep. 590; Dicks v. Johnson, 66 Fla. 306, 63 South. Rep. 700; Berryhill-Cromartie Co. v. Manitowoc Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 66 Fla. 170, 63 South. Rep. 720. The defendant contends that, as the evidence showed F. F. Bardin, a member of the firm of Bardin & Brown, the payees in the note,…
• Davis v. Leighton, 80 Fla. 594 (Fla. 1920)
  …1465, Gen. Stats., 1906, Sec. 1465, Florida Compiled Laws. White v. Camp, 1 Fla. 94; Prescott v. Johnson, 8 Fla. 391; Reddick v. Mickler, 23 Fla. 335, 2 South. Rep. 698; Smith v. LeVesque & Anderson, 25 Fla. 464, 6 South. Rep. 263; Dicks v. Johnson, 66 Fla. 306, 63 South. Rep. 700. The burden of proof upon the issue made not having been met by plaintiff, there was error in directing a ver [*598] diet for him, and the judgment must therefore be reversed. Browne, C. J., and Taylor and Whitfield, J. J., con…