ARNOLD ROSS DANIELS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HARRIS, Judge.
Daniels appeals from an order summarily denying a motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We find that the motion does not comply with the requirements of the rule in that there is no mention of any prior appeals or prior post-conviction motions. See Evans v. State, 388 So. 2d 1366 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
We therefore affirm the trial court on the present record without prejudice to Daniels to file a new motion in conformance with the rules.
We note, however, for the guidance of the trial court, that it failed to attach all necessary documents to its order to justify summary disposition, and one attachment seems contradictory to the court’s statement in its order. AFFIRMED.
COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Burns v. State, 651 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)…appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion is affirmed without prejudice. Appellant may file an amended motion, in compliance with Rule 3.850(c)(3), that states “whether a previous posteonviction motion has been filed, and if so, how many.” See Daniels v. State, 597 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Evans v. State, 388 So. 2d 1366 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Moreover, several of the allegations in Appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion are legally insufficient. If Appellant files an amended 3.850 petition, he shall file claims that meet th…
-
Lindsey v. State, 627 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED without prejudice to refile a motion per Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 3.860, which complies with that rule. See Daniels v. State, 597 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Siegel v. State, 586 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). W. SHARP, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Evans v. State, 388 So. 2d 1366 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)