WILLIE JAMES GLOVER, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1992-02-28
No. 92-00481
FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
598 So. 2d 85 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1992) Caution
Cited by 8 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Willie J. Glover, Jr., timely appeals the summary denial of his motion to allow credit for jail time. Although the trial judge denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing, he did not attach to his order any portion of the files or records to refute appellant’s allegations.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion and remand the case to the trial court. On remand, unless the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, the court shall order the state attorney to file an answer within a time certain. After receipt of the answer, the court shall determine whether an evidentiary hearing is required. If the court should again deny appellant’s motion, he has thirty days in which to appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jonathan M. Drucker, Jonathan Drucker, P.A. v. Duvall, 61 So. 3d 468 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
    …1) (citation omitted). This proposition is limited, however, by the “rule in Florida that ordinarily a contract cannot bind one who is not a party thereto or has not in some fashion agreed to accept its terms.” CH2M Hill Se., Inc. v. Pinellas Cnty., 598 So. 2d 85, 89 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); see also Pozo v. Roadhouse Grill, Inc., 790 So. 2d 1255, 1260-61 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (refusing to enforce a forum selection clause against a nonparty). The record contains no evidence that appellants were parties to or inten…
  • Baldwin v. Nature's Hideaway, 613 So. 2d 1376 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)
    …ns and granted the appellee a permanent injunction on that basis. It is wholly within our scope of review to read these restrictions and come to our own conclusion as to their proper interpretation. See CH2M Hill Southeast, Inc. v. Pinellas County, 598 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). The carrying on of an occupation is mentioned in subparagraph 2 of Section 5 and is subject to the umbrella words of that section. Section 5 refers to nuisances and prohibits the doing of anything on any lot in the subdivision wh…
  • CH2M Hill Se., Inc. v. Pinellas Cnty., 698 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
    …ed for retrial. This court indicated that an issue to be tried on remand was whether Hill breached its contractual design responsibilities by allowing Interpace to use class IV wire for the pipeline. See CH2M Hill Southeast, Inc. v. Pinellas County, 598 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 613 So. 2d 7 (Fla.1992). On remand, the County argued that the breach of contractual responsibilities issue, as stated in the Second District opinion, was not the sole issue to be tried. The trial court entered an order l…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw