HOMOSASSA TRAVELERS ASSOCIATES, LTD., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
MID-STATE FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, F/K/A MID-STATE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, APPELLEE
HOMOSASSA TRAVELERS ASSOCIATES, LTD., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
MID-STATE FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, F/K/A MID-STATE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, APPELLEE
598 So. 2d 141
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1992)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 23 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This appeal concerns a final summary judgment in a mortgage foreclosure action. We affirm except for the amount of interest allowed by the final judgment.
The basis for the interest computation is not apparent from the record and cannot be explained by any of the parties. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing to determine the amount of interest due.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
GOSHORN, C.J., and PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (22 total)
-
Warner v. Warner, 692 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)…rates of statutory interest. We disagree, however, that the court erred in refusing to award interest on the equitable distribution payments. The decision to award interest on such payments is a matter within a trial court’s discretion. Rey v. Rey, 598 So. 2d 141, 145 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) (“The imposition of interest on payments to be made in equitable distribution is a discretionary matter with the trial court.”). In Rey, this court recognized that interest payments may substantially impact the overall schem…
-
Kennedy v. Kennedy, 622 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)…rds based on similar facts, it could find that the trial court had abused its discretion. But the court (and all other appellate courts) have been doing something similar for years under the concept that “the wife has been shortchanged.” Rey v. Rey, 598 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Decker v. Decker, 534 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Pirino v. Pirino, 525 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Overstreet v. Overstreet, 513 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Marsh v. Marsh, 489 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Tulle…
-
Hill v. Hooten, 776 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…al, dental, and prescription medication expenses of the minor child be made directly to the payee on a percentage basis. (Emphasis added). On remand, the amended final judgment must include a provision with regard to these expenses. See Rey v. Rey, 598 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). Other Issues We have considered Wife’s other claims of error relating to COBRA coverage and payment for the marital residence and affirm the trial court’s rulings thereon. As to the COBRA claim, the judgment is not ambiguous a…
Previewing 3 of 22 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence